Washington
Post: Too Much Fluoride in Water?
DIRECTORY: Health
/ EPA Standards
/ News
Articles / Washington Post 1981
The Washington Post
December 10, 1981
Too Much Fluoride in the Water?
By Walter Pincus
It wasn't that long ago when some conservative groups were opposing
the introduction of fluoride into local water systems, saying that
the addition of the chemical to fight tooth decay was a sign that
communism was taking over.
Well, fluoride in water systems is an issue again. But this time
it's the federal government that wants to cut back levels, and a
relatively conservative state--South Carolina--fighting the idea,
according to a notice in the Dec. 1 Federal Register (page 58345)
Back in 1975, the government moved to reduce fluoride levels after
the U.S. surgeon general determined that too much fluoride could
cause "dental fluorosis," which in in "its most severe
forms" can cause staining, pitting and flaking of dental enamel.
South Carolina studied the water supply in 43 communities and found
that "the costs of fluoride reduction would make compliance
with the current regulations economically burdensome.
In its petition to the Environmental Protection Agency to get the
rules changed, South Carolinia claimed that "fluorosis is essentially
an aesthetic effect" that doesn't deserve to be "controlled
by a national drinking water regulation."
Sympathetic to the South Carolina concerns, the EPA already had
a study under way to come up with revised water regulations by the
fall of 1983. Given the state's concerns, EPA will now accelerate
its work and come up with a decision "in approximately August
of 1982," according to the notice.
|