Federal Government

July 9, 2008

Motion to Vacate Settlement Denied
U.S. District Court, District of Columbia

The following transaction was entered on 7/9/2008
Case Name: MOMS AGAINST MERCURY et al v. ESCHENBACH et al
Case Number: 1:07-cv-2332

MINUTE ORDER: Given plaintiff Karen Palmer's retainer agreement with counsel, as well as the correspondence between plaintiff and Charles Brown, and plaintiff's lack of objection until after the fact of settlement, the Court will deny the motion to vacate the settlement because Brown had the necessary authority to settle, and the settlement was eminently reasonable, especially given the fact that it achieved more than would have been attainable via the lawsuit.

Signed by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle on July 9, 2008

© Copyright 2003-2024 Consumers for Dental Choice, Inc.