We sue FDA top brass on Dec. 28, 2007 -- seek removal of mercury fillings from market

Last May, we notified FDA lawyers that, due to the agency’s decades of (illegal) intransigence in classifying mercury amalgam, we were preparing a complaint in the US District Court, pursuant to the guideposts from the US Court of Appeals ruling in Moms Against Mercury v. FDA.  FDA asked us for a meeting instead.  At that meeting with top FDA officials, Dr. Mike Fleming, lawyer Jim Turner, and I were told that FDA realized it needed to move forward; we said we would wait 30 days.

At the end of that 30 days (in June 2007), the FDA Commissioner’s office phoned and said with enthusiasm, “You will like our plan,” promising details the next day.  The next day, FDA counsel phoned me and said FDA intended to begin the classifying process, by issuing an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR).  I asked the lawyer to put that promise in writing, which she did.  I then immediately contacted two reporters (from FDA Week and the Bureau of Nat. Affairs Medical Devices Reporter), both of whom called FDA’s press office, which confirmed the agency would issue such an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, by the end of the calendar year at the latest. 

Month after month, we waited.  No ANPR issued.  In November, FDA witness Norris Alderson, FDA’s lead scientist (his degree is in veterinary medicine), appeared before Congress and stonewalled, repeatedly misleading Congress and refusing even to commit to doing an Environmental Assessment (legally required).  Over the past 15 years, FDA repeatedly promises (to courts, to Congress, to petitioners) to classify mercury fillings -- then doesn’t.  Fool me once, shame on you; fool me repeatedly, shame on me.  So I guess the shame is on me for, in my naiveté, actually believing FDA when the agency lawyers make a written promise.

FDA lied. Accordingly, on the last workday of the calendar year (Fri. Dec. 28, 2007), my co-counsel Bob Reeves and I sued. The detailed lawsuit is at www.toxicteeth.org/Complaint_Dec282007.pdf

The malfeasance at FDA -- this sequence of illegal actions to shield dentists’ pocketbooks instead of showing any concern with children’s health, unborn children’s lives, or the environment -- extends deep into the agency.  Accordingly, we sued six individuals at FDA (not just the Commissioner), going five layers deep into the agency.  We are going to stop these autocratic bureaucrats from hiding behind each other.

Charlie Brown
9 January 2008


Charles G. Brown, National Counsel
Consumers for Dental Choice
316 F St., N.E., Suite 210 , Washington, DC 20002
Ph. 202.544-6333; fax 544-6331
charlie@toxicteeth.org; www.toxicteeth.org           

© Copyright 2003-2016 Consumers for Dental Choice, Inc.